Showing posts with label Context. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Context. Show all posts

35 - Subprime Equity Loans

abandoned-house-auburn-2008jpg-089b37cb6d68e85b_largeGemma and I watched Michael Moore’s documentary Capitalism: A Love Story the other night. In the film, Moore connects the sale of suspect equity loans in the US and the ensuing subprime housing collapse. I first read about all of this in The Big Short: Inside the Doomsday Machine by Michael Lewis and it was a fascinating recounting but given how we’ve structured our investment property loans I thought it’s important to distinguish between a subprime equity loan and an equity loan in Australia.

From what I understand (and the entire situation was designed to be incredibly complicated), bank deregulation in the US lead to the availability of cheap finance for people who couldn’t actually afford to make the repayments. Banks, politicians, capitalism—you know what a dangerous cocktail that is. The US financial system then created products which bundled up those loans and subsequently sold products which bet against the homeowners making their repayments (derivatives and collateralised debt obligations or CDOs). It was only a matter of time until the foreclosures started rolling in en-masse and a few people got rich while a lot of people lost a lot of money.

Banking regulations are much tighter in Australia but more importantly I wouldn’t take on a loan if I hadn’t myself assessed our ability to afford the repayments. In other words, the closest we got in Australia in recent times to a subprime situation was around 2006 and the banking regulators here put a stop to all of that pretty quickly (and of course what was happening in Australia was nothing like what was allowed to happen in the US). From recent experience, I can vouch for the bank’s rigour in assessing our credit situation—it’s only gotten harder to get credit in the last few years, especially with the 2015 changes implemented by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority.

As always, there is lot of information circulation about what’s good and what’s bad from sources which are good and bad. It’s important to do your own research and make your own decisions before acting but don’t forget it’s equally important to do something so inflation doesn’t do it for you.

I suppose a disclaimer is also worth posting: I'm just a guy, I'm not an accountant, lawyer, solicitor, tax agent, mortgage broker, banker, financial adviser, insurance agent, land developer, builder, government agent, or anything else so I disclaim your application of anything I write here is to be applied at your own risk. What I write may be incorrect and you are best to seek your own professional advice (tax, legal, financial, and otherwise) before entering into contracts or spending your money. Your situation is unique to you and what I write here reflects my experience only. This content is not professional advice and is not tailored to your situation. I'm learning too and expect to make many, many mistakes along the way.

Enjoy,

Michael

17 – The New Addition and a Change in Circumstances

Stay-At-Home-DadI’ve been a little quiet on the blog front as of late—for good reason: our second child arrived on Sunday morning, a little boy! If it were a previous age, I’d have extra reason to be excited, now having a male heir to who I can leave my vast riches and estates*… in our time, we’ll divide our assets in two between the kids but I’ll write more about wills another time. In brief, having a second child has highlighted the need to buttress our finances and ensure their well-being. 

Benjamin’s arrival also means his mother is now on maternity for the next twelve months, which, not coincidentally, means we’re now a zero-income family. In other words, time for me to hang up my apron and get back to work.

My original plan on this front was to return to the world of IT contracting but the current market situation in Perth isn’t as hot as it was a few years ago, on the back of the resources sector, and there aren’t as many options as I’d hoped for. In truth, I’ve always been pretty lousy at timing these things!

I could continue at home and enjoy this period with my wife and children. I’m sure we’d scrape by. I could also leave it for a while and revisit in three to six months. But the idea of having no income between the two of us, the fact we’ll be needing to support our first investment property financially—at least in part—from around August/September/October, and our plans for an overseas trip which will cost thousands in flights alone, leaves me wanting for some pocket money. What a pain, this working stuff!

I’m also considering whether I want to take on a job with less responsibility and a correspondingly low rate of pay or do something a little more stressful but that will generate a higher return on my time invested. It’s tricky this one: do I make it home for dinner every night or just push hard and maximise the limited time I’ll have back in the workforce?

On a related note, I spoke with our mortgage broker about the possibilities of a taking on a second IP sooner rather than later—presumably once I’m working full time again but while the wife’s still on maternity leave. We still have plenty of equity in our PPOR and the sooner we get one or more investment properties built, the sooner we can leverage the equity in those properties to duplicate.

Nathan at Mortgage Choice noted many lenders are wary of considering potential future income from a woman on maternity leave because—in percentages—many women do not return to work. He noted a letter from the wife’s employer would be required at a minimum. We left it there for now but decided to reconvene on the subject in August once I’ve hopefully been back at work for a little while.

In the meantime, I’ve lined up a second call with Michael Beresford at Open Wealth to discuss our options for IP #2. No reason not to at least have a chat!

I suppose a disclaimer is also worth posting: I'm just a guy, I'm not an accountant, lawyer, solicitor, tax agent, mortgage broker, banker, financial adviser, insurance agent, land developer, builder, government agent, or anything else so I disclaim your application of anything I write here is to be applied at your own risk. What I write may be incorrect and you are best to seek your own professional advice (tax, legal, financial, and otherwise) before entering into contracts or spending your money. Your situation is unique to you and what I write here reflects my experience only. This content is not professional advice and is not tailored to your situation. I'm learning too and expect to make many, many mistakes along the way.

Enjoy,

Michael

6 – Think Rich

Immediately after writing my last post “How to Spend Money”—in which I advocate being frugal and not spending money unnecessarily, a library book I’d reserved came available: Robert Kyosaki’s Rich Dad’s Guide to Investing. The first section of this book is almost entirely dedicated to the concept of retraining and refocusing your mind to think like the rich do. In other words, instead of pinching pennies as part of a frame of reference where money is scare, change your mindset to one in which money is abundant and don’t be cheap.

This makes a lot of sense to me. I won’t make a full about-face in follow up to “How to Spend Money” but am inclined to adjust my thinking somewhat. The standard disclaimer I include with every blog post includes a note that I’m learning too, so here’s direct evidence of that! Most importantly, I’m learning and have a very open mind on financial matters as I’m not yet prejudiced by a lot of experience; I’m therefore willing to adapt and adjust my thinking on the fly and explore new ideas and concepts like this one.

A note: I realise this post isn’t directly related to property investment but—for me—property investment is simply a means (a “vehicle” in rich dad speak) to wealth.

Although I’ve not necessarily been cheap, I’ve definitely been frugal often and modesty always has been—and always will be—a pillar of what it means to be me.

Rich dad wisdom suggests being frugal is okay but there’s no sense in being rich but living poor. As an extension to that, it’s worth pointing out another Rich Dad pearl, which suggests having a low income and high expenses is superior to the traditional goal of having a high income and low expenses. In other words, use good expenses to reduce your taxable income (and to tie that back to our current discussion: don’t be cheap by trying to keep your expenses low). I’ll add this book is by far the best of the three Rich Dad, Poor Dad books I’ve read to date—it’s very conceptual but so worth the read—see the Amazon.com link above to check it out.

Frugality I would define as choosing to not be extravagant in your daily spending habits (for me this also relates directly to my greenie sensibilities: I choose not to be a consumer and pollute my environment with unnecessary packaging and products). I always prefer to buy quality and do not buy to throw away—this is and always will be a way of life for me. If I were cheap, I would buy poorly made, disposable things in quantity—at the very least.

To quote from Kiyoaski’s book: “My rich dad would say, ‘There are two ways to become rich. One way is to earn more. The other way is to desire less. The problem is that most people are not good with either way.’ […] this book [is] about how you can earn more so you can desire more.”

I’ve not been too bad on the desiring less front but I do look at people around me who seem content spending a lot of money and wish I could be less frugal, if not less cheap! I certainly want to be more generous and focus the money I must spend on the positive aspects of life.

Kiyosaki also cites another article on this subject which suggests the wealth you can build by living as though you were poor is finite (the article cited also discusses penny pinching in the context of becoming not just a “millionaire” but a “multimillionaire”).

The book doesn’t offer much in terms of definition between frugality and cheapness but the author does leave us with another rich dad quote: “‘If you want to be really rich, you need to know when to be frugal and when to be a spendthrift. The problem is that too many people know how to be cheap only.’” I think this point also extends beyond the black and white argument of frugality versus cheapness and into the broader educational context of the investor: do we understand the difference between good debt and bad debt, good expenses and bad expenses, assets versus liabilities, taxation laws, ownership structures, etc, etc? In other words, are we being constantly cheap or are we being selectively cheap? I mentioned in the previous post not spending money on a depreciating asset like a car; that’s not frugality but rather understanding how not to waste money quickly.

Notably, Kiyosaki goes on to write (later in the book) that rich dad focused on delayed gratification in the short term in favour of a long-term reward. I think this is key and really at the crux of what I was suggesting in my earlier post. Nonetheless, I do believe in the power of setting goals and ‘thinking yourself’ into the reality you desire. 

As a final thought, I’ll suggest not being cheap doesn’t mean splashing out at every opportunity. Meanwhile, keep thinking rich!

I suppose a disclaimer is also worth posting: I'm just a guy, I'm not an accountant, lawyer, solicitor, tax agent, mortgage broker, banker, financial adviser, insurance agent, land developer, builder, government agent, or anything else so I disclaim your application of anything I write here is to be applied at your own risk. What I write may be incorrect and you are best to seek your own professional advice (tax, legal, financial, and otherwise) before entering into contracts or spending your money. Your situation is unique to you and what I write here reflects my experience only. This content is not professional advice and is not tailored to your situation. I'm learning too and expect to make many, many mistakes along the way.

Enjoy,

Michael

4 - Risky Business?

Risk is one of those misunderstood concepts that seemingly plagues everything we do: riding a bike is risky, crossing the street is risky, buying property is risky.

I’ve found people throw around the word risk in a very self-limiting way and when it’s used in the context of any random conversation they: 

a) haven’t identified the actual risks that apply to that situation;

b) haven’t classified those risks in terms of their likelihood of actually occurring and the impact if they do occur;

c) haven’t identified ways of mitigating those risks or reducing the likelihood of their occurrence and severity should they occur.

Your mom or sister or brother or uncle will just say “oohhh that’s too risky for me” without understanding why it’s risky. This annoys me to no end because their ignorance suggests I haven’t evaluated risk and am therefore as ignorant and blind as they are myself—I am not!

Experience also reduces the risks that apply and time, of course, redresses many risks—especially in the world of long-term property investment.

Not taking risks could be said to be just as risky as taking managed risks! How else do we move forward as individuals and as a society and culture?!? NASA didn’t put men on the moon without taking risks.

The key to managing risk in any situation is understanding and qualifying the risks that might eventuate.

The example cited above of riding a bicycle is simplistic but the risks of riding a bike are numerous and include falling off, getting hit by a car, riding into a pedestrian, vehicle, animal, or lake, the chain falling off, getting wet if it rains, getting a flat tyre, having to shower when you get to work but having no soap. I used to ride my bike to work every day and these are all real risks!

Having identified the risks, scrutinise each risk in further detail to categorise and rate each one. Here are a few examples from bike riding:

  • Falling off: There’s a small chance you might fall off your bike and the result might be of no consequence if you land on your feet or it might be catastrophic if you bump your head. Maybe you’re riding over a loose surface or in the snow. Maybe you’re trying to stay balanced while you’re clipped in at a traffic light. Maybe you’ve made the poor decision to ride home after a few beers on a Friday night after work. The risk of falling off could be decomposed into several risks which are easier to think about and to manage but let’s keep things simple for now. In all cases, you can mitigate the risk of falling off by wearing a helmet and gloves, taking a safe route on bike paths and becoming familiar with the route and all of its hazards, and of course making good decisions while you ride such as unclipping from your pedals at intersections! You could also take out life insurance to cover your healthcare expenses, protect your income if you’re seriously hurt, and reduce your liability if you hurt someone else.
  • Flat tyre: This one’s easy: the risk is very low as it’s bound to happen every so often and is something that can be fixed on the spot in ten minutes (or worst case: call someone to collect you and your bike). Mitigation includes not riding over broken glass and fields of prickles; of course, you’ll also want to carry a spare tube or patch kit, tyre levers, and a pump and a flat may make you late for work… which might get you fired.

Don’t forget to take a moment to look at the risks in the context of what you gain, which in the case of our example include improved health (if you don’t fall off!), cost-effective transport and exercise, less stress, nice tan, etc.

In a similar vein, property investment has it’s own set of risks but it’s not inherently “risky”. You’ll want to identify the risks that apply to your situation but this is easily done and takes only a few minutes to think through the details. You’ll sleep better at night having done so—I promise: if your mind starts playing tricks, all you have to do is return to your risk assessment and you can say “nup, that’s a low-likelihood risk and although the consequences are high these mitigations are in place” and carry on sleeping.

Here’s a shortlist of property risks to get you started:

  • Buying a low growth property
  • Buying a property with expensive problems (pests, asbestos, etc)
  • Buying a low cash flow property
  • Paying more than the property is worth (i.e. buying at auction)
  • Sharks and dodgy investments
  • Problem tenants/property management
  • Vacancy
  • Unexpected repairs/shonky builder
  • Interest rate increases
  • Job loss
  • Hidden costs (stamp duty, mortgage lender’s insurance, council rates, insurance, accounting, management, etc)
  • Change in legislation (i.e. taxation laws relating to negative gearing)
  • Liquidity
  • Capital gains tax
  • Selling costs

It’s also important to weigh up the risks you identify in context of the reward—the gains you stand to make if the risks you identify do not eventuate. These might include income through a positively geared property, equity, and wealth.

We mitigated a number of the early risks related to buying by going through Open Wealth but I compiled a risk matrix for each of the risks that do apply in our case, specifically as we move into the post-construction phase. It’s a simple grid. I noted the risk, the criteria for that risk to be fulfilled, probability, impact, ranking, mitigation, and contingency.

Simplistic definitions for these terms are as follows:

Probability:

  • Improbable
  • Remote
  • Occasional
  • Probable
  • Frequent

Impact:

  • Negligible
  • Marginal
  • Critical
  • Catastrophic

Ranking:

  • Acceptable as-is
  • Acceptable with controls
  • Undesirable
  • Unacceptable

If, in future, I do encounter one or more of the risks I’ve defined, I have a ready-made framework for understanding those risks—at the very least—and some initial guidance for dealing with them in the heat of the moment. Hopefully I’ve taken steps to mitigate a risk before it becomes a big problem. If nothing else, my risk matrix is an integral part of my strategy relating to property investment and prompts me to think about things that might go wrong before they go wrong—or more specifically—how to measure my success or lack thereof.

Property investment is not inherently risky and I consider it to be far less risky than investing in stocks, where you have no real control over how your investment performs, or leaving in the bank to suffer at the hand of inflation. Many risks in the property sphere are readily overcome and the risk of losing money—or not making money—are often under your control with reasonable opportunities for mitigation.

Of course not doing anything is the biggest risk of all to building your future wealth. Time, conversely, is your biggest ally and will help to remove many short-term risks if you’re prepared to hold and ride out any lumps and bumps.

I suppose a disclaimer is also worth posting: I'm just a guy, I'm not an accountant, lawyer, solicitor, tax agent, mortgage broker, banker, financial adviser, insurance agent, land developer, builder, government agent, or anything else so I disclaim your application of anything I write here is to be applied at your own risk. What I write may be incorrect and you are best to seek your own professional advice (tax, legal, financial, and otherwise) before entering into contracts or spending your money. Your situation is unique to you and what I write here reflects my experience only. I'm learning too and expect to make many, many mistakes along the way.

Enjoy,

Michael

2 - Choose to Live Well

New Year’s Eve approaches and I’m feeling reflective—on the year that was and the year to come. Specifically, I’m thinking a great deal about what it means to be happy, free, and self-sustaining. I look to my family for these things as they make me happy and help me (us) to be free and, eventually, self-sustaining.

As a stay-at-home dad, I made a conscious decision to put aside, if not discard, my career in IT and take on a role unfamiliar to many men. I handed financial control—at least the income generating aspects—to my wife. Rather than being the member of our family with the highest income, my raw financial contribution in dollars and cents become zero and I spend my days wiping bums and playing house. In short, as Robert Kiyosaki might say, I stopped doing what I can do best: making money as an employee.

Has this hurt us, financially? Not really. Not yet. Not in the short term. Fortunately my wife makes a decent income on her own and this year has been financially productive with her working rurally for six months. I’m not contributing to my superannuation, of course. Had I been working, most of my income would have been put towards paying down the mortgage on our family home. These are important things to think about, particularly in regards to our future financial position and our ability to retire comfortably. My time as a productive employee is limited, after all.

Do we live any less well than than we did when we both worked? No. We’ve always lived frugally. Realistically we’ve been a single family income for a while now as my wife had twelve months off when our first child was born (only a fourth months of which, roughly, was paid). We’ve become accustomed to tightly managing our available funds and resources and while we don’t scrimp and pinch pennies as much as we once did, we by no means lead a lavish lifestyle today.

We’ve essentially chosen to live well.

Our daughter would have had to go to day care, full-time, from the age of one, if I had opted to continue working. Or my wife would have had to put on hold many, many years of education and training in the medical field to stay at home (part-time work is not a real option for her today). Sure, we could have bought some more furniture and some overhead cabinets for the kitchen and maybe another big machine for my woodworking shop but all of those things can wait. In general our long-term lifestyle goals are not much different than our reality today: no flashy cars, no big house, no designer clothes; we appreciate the simple things in life.

A second income would also make us more appealing to the banks in terms of investment loans but I know what we can and cannot afford in terms of debt service so I’ll take my business to the lender who best understands that. Notably, securing funding for this first investment property has not been a problem, primarily because of the equity in our PPOR.

I’m also somewhat fatalistic and I know I won’t live forever. I’m not living it up today, in my thirties, to counterbalance that eventuality, but I despise the idea of working myself to the bone, slumped over a desk day in and day out while life and reality pass me by. My wife would like to work part-time one day in the future (when it will be easier for her to do so) and I genuinely hope she can. She does have a significant contribution to offer society as a doctor but there’s no denying the past ten years of training has been gruesome and taken a toll on our family life.

This is the reason why I’ve opted to invest in residential property. It’s the hope of achieving financial freedom, at relatively low risk, and the promise—however distant—of making a passive income legitimately. An empire of appreciating land, buttressed by the houses on that land generating income so I don’t have to, is, for me, the pinnacle of financial success and personal financial security. There are complexities. There will be hard times ahead. There are also simplicities and there will be good times ahead too.

I spent a significant amount of time this year preparing mentally, through knowledge-building, to start executing a multi-year (multi-decade) investment strategy focused exclusively on residential property. I have minimal experience in this area. There is no doubt I will make mistakes but in pushing forward I gain experience and ultimately reduce and remove risk. As a stay-at-home dad I had a bit of spare time (not much though!) to fast-track my property investment education and I’m reliant on a number of companies to help me stay on track. I like to think I’m not idle at home (beyond the twelve-hour days running the house, that is) and that I’m contributing—financially—to my family’s long-term success and our future ability to live well.

I suppose a disclaimer is also worth posting: I'm just a guy, I'm not an accountant, lawyer, solicitor, tax agent, mortgage broker, banker, financial adviser, insurance agent, land developer, builder, government agent, or anything else so I disclaim your application of anything I write here is to be applied at your own risk. What I write may be incorrect and you are best to seek your own professional advice (tax, legal, financial, and otherwise) before entering into contracts or spending your money. Your situation is unique to you and what I write here reflects my experience only. I'm learning too and expect to make many, many mistakes along the way.

Happy new year,

Michael

The Players

Continuing from my introductory post, there's us. Who are we? I've already mentioned I'm not an accountant or a financial planner.

Me. I'm a stay at home dad, full-time. I earn nothing. I receive no Centrelink or other government benefits. I do not work part-time. I'm a stay at home dad 24 x 7 x 365, with no sick days, no real holidays--not even public holiday off, and I can't even steal stationary. I built a career in IT, working in and out of the private and public sectors for many years although I consider myself predominantly a contractor—i.e. a body for hire. The stay at home dad seed was planted very early in my career and I worked professionally for about ten years from the age of 24 before "retiring". I was earning a very healthy bit of cash before giving away my career and we've sustained a hit without that money coming in. With my wife working more than full-time this arrangement was better for us than having a young child in day care and that child has thrived. I originate from Canada but immigrated to Australia as a young man to live with my new wife and we've been married for ages now.

The missus. She is to be henceforth referred to as “dear wife” or the equivalent. She's a paediatric registrar so basically a trainee doctor (a senior trainee, mind you). So also basically a grunt—or at least she has been. The residents and registrars do all of the night shifts and the weekends and the public holidays and Christmas. If you or your kids have ever considered studying medicine, I'd say don't waste your time. The wife studied at university for six years or so and now, in her mid-thirties, she's nearly finished her formal training. Did I mention the pay is uninspiring? It is. This is a government position, essentially—and it's contract-based so essentially she's a top-tier professional who's had to put up with poor working conditions (public hospital), horrendous hours, low pay, and little real job security for about ten years. My wife is also a very good doctor, not only smart and efficient but a good communicator too.

I should say here don’t let the doctoring thing put you off. Doctor-schmocktor. Our single income is likely less than that of your typical dual-income Perth family and if you flip through a publication like Australian Property Investor you’ll see many single men and women on modest incomes achieving extraordinary things in property. Yes, my wife is a doctor but read on and you’ll see how we actually live—the workload I mention above should offer an idea. If you have a bit of money to your name or, better yet, equity in your current home, there’s so much you can do. My wife could be a plumber and me a bum and it wouldn’t make a great difference.

The Kid. She's two and half. Popped out a while ago and is starting to become expensive. It's not any single one thing but, for example, I recently tallied up the cost of our swimming lessons over a one year period and it was $700 or $800. Then there's nappies, clothes, food, toys, books, furniture, baby gym, petrol to and from activities, medication, and other medical costs. For a little person who suckled her mother until the age of two it's amazing how much money she soaks up. Good thing she's loveable and cute. We’ve got another one on the way.

Lifestyle. I'll write more about this in future posts but I include it here as a summary of who we are as a family. Essentially we started our lives together having to scrimp and save with very little financial support from our parents and we continue to live and breathe that ethos today. We spend rarely and when we do it's with hesitance and consideration. We do not live lavishly. We do not drive fancy cars (we were a single car family until this year). We don't holiday abroad apart for the very occasional trip home to Canada. We dine out occasionally. We don't drink much. Don't smoke. Don't eat meat—we're vegetarians, actually. I bought our first big flat panel TV on Gumtree used for $150 and it was only a 42 incher. Some of the furniture in our house was handed down from my wife’s parents and until this year we still had the old purple microfibre couch her brother gave us when we moved back to Perth… his dogs had slept on it prior to that and Charlotte spewed all over it while breastfeeding so it was finally due for replacement. In other words, we save—again, I'll explain how later.

In a nutshell, that's us. I’ll no doubt expand on the above in future posts.

I suppose a disclaimer is also worth posting: I'm just a guy, I'm not an accountant, lawyer, solicitor, tax agent, mortgage broker, banker, financial adviser, insurance agent, land developer, builder, government agent, or anything else so I disclaim your application of anything I write here is to be applied at your own risk. What I write may be incorrect and you are best to seek your own professional advice (tax, legal, financial, and otherwise) before entering into contracts or spending your money. Your situation is unique to you and what I write here reflects my experience only. I'm learning too and expect to make many, many mistakes along the way.

Enjoy,
Michael