46 – Holiday Homes Make Poor Investments

We spent last weekend five hours South of Perth in Albany, WA. With the kids in tow, we rented a cutesy old cottage for they duration so they’d have their own rooms and space to run around.

Being away in this context soon got me thinking about the many reasons why we veered away from holiday homes/apartments as an investment. With family frequently visiting from intrastate and overseas, a property that could be rented out is when not in use was hugely appealing to us at first glance but many reasons led us to reconsider.

When we first started looking seriously at property investment, one of my first thoughts was to purchase a holiday apartment. I figured something with a few bedrooms in nearby Scarborough might not cost too much and “Scarbs” is an increasingly vibrant area in Perth. It’s also a good spot for visiting tourists with its expansive beaches and nearby amenities. I’ll note this was before I came to prefer land (i.e. a house on a block of land) over apartments and decided to invest for long-term growth rather than cash flow—in short, don’t buy an apartment because the land content ratio is too low…). In general, you’ll likely pay a premium to buy in a holiday location—which may not relate to long-term capital growth. In other words, are you better off buying into a highly-priced holiday location or doing your research to buy into a cheaper suburb that’s likely to grow faster and produce a better return on investment in the long run?

We also had to ask ourselves whether we buy something local for the sake of the visiting relies or choose something further afield in a more interesting (to us) location—either out of town or in another state. If we wanted to make use of the property ourselves, would a “holiday at home” (er, a property in Perth, where we live) be all that desirable?

Regardless of location, the ability to produce an income will always be at the mercy of the local short-term rental market and tourism conditions. Although I’m no expert in this area, I’ll hazard a guess that sites like Air BnB are eating into the traditional short stay markets.

With a normal rental, you have the surety (in a way) of a guaranteed weekly rent for the term of the lease. With a holiday home, you might have a higher nightly rate but the uncertainty of whether the property will be full one night and vacant the next—which, on average, may or may not equate to the same income as a regular rental. Averages are useful but may hide seasonal ups and downs and corresponding cash flow troughs throughout the financial year.

Unlike a typical suburban house rental where we’re renting a property to a tenant as a place to live, as their home, with a holiday home we’re dealing with a different set of variables. How closely are holiday makers vetted? How do we insure the property? Will neighbours object to the comings and goings of visitors at unusual hours? What happens if China crashes and the Chinese tourists suddenly dry up? We had a global recession not all that long ago; are the Yanks still flying in to little old Perth at the same rate they were before the dot com and housing market crashes?

At the very least, you’ll need to estimate vacancy, affix a nightly rental price tag that fits the market and attracts the right kind of holiday makers or travellers, and then consider marketing costs (for your online listing, membership with the local tourism body or visitor centre, etc) and cleaning costs. Of course the property will also need to be furnished with not only furniture and appliances but linens, cookware, books/DVDs, artwork, etc. Other running costs will include electricity, water, gardening, and possibly cable and internet, as well as the usual rates and insurances.

Don’t forget, if you want to use the property yourself, the ATO will require you to exclude the period when the property was not available for rent as a percentage of any deductions you might want to claim (i.e. negative gearing). On the upside, you may be able to claim a higher rate of depreciation (4% p.a. over 25 years instead of 2.5% p.a. over 40 years).

If you want to use the property yourself during peak periods, then you’ll likely have to forego any income the property would otherwise generate during that time.

The property we rented in Albany, although lovely in an historic kind of way and very practical for our young family, has zero appeal to me from a practical and maintenance standpoint. Although the main house felt sturdy and sound, the back extension (these places always have a back extension, right?!?) had a definite lilt to it despite being the newer construction.

Then my wife plugged in the kettle for her morning tea but it wouldn’t switch on because she’d unwittingly tripped the circuit. Of course we just thought the kettle was a dud—until it came time for a shower and we had no hot water from the instant gas system with its electric ignition. It took a very upset wife and a call to the neighbouring manager, at 8:30am on a Sunday morning, to sort that one out.

We’ve been living in a relatively new house in Perth for going on a decade now and although it’s been a pretty easy run there are always things to deal with—we’ve already had to replace the hot water tank, for example. I cannot begin to imagine the countless number of ongoing issues to be found with an older house. On the one hand, it’s established and “bedded in” but how soon until the roof needs replacing or the foundation restumping? Insects and damp or mould may be problematic in older houses and the electrics may be shady.

Although I’d love to have a nearby holiday home for the relatives or a beach shack down south that we can use periodically, as an investment we’ll be sticking with suburban houses for now and fork out for a week or two in that holiday rental when we want to get away.

I suppose a disclaimer is also worth posting: I'm just a guy, I'm not an accountant, lawyer, solicitor, tax agent, mortgage broker, banker, financial adviser, insurance agent, land developer, builder, government agent, or anything else so I disclaim your application of anything I write here is to be applied at your own risk. What I write may be incorrect and you are best to seek your own professional advice (tax, legal, financial, and otherwise) before entering into contracts or spending your money. Your situation is unique to you and what I write here reflects my experience only. This content is not professional advice and is not tailored to your situation. I’m not selling anything and I do not receive any form of commission or incentive payments for any companies or individuals I endorse. I'm learning too and expect to make many, many mistakes along the way.

Enjoy,

Michael

44 - Re-letting IP#1

Our Brisbane tenants vacated the property in early September at the conclusion of their lease. No clear motivation for their departure was supplied to us by the property manager, apart from the girlfriend being pregnant. I wonder if the $5/month rent increase we applied when the lease was renewed/reworked was partly to blame but I suspect the tenancy simply ran its course. The local Griffin rental market is currently oversupplied and rents have fallen slightly.

The outgoing tenants willingly tidied up and addressed a handful of issues that required attention (a chipped kitchen tile, dog faeces in the back garden, some cleaning residue on the walls). Having the house empty was also a good opportunity for the builder to rectify a roofing defect and related ceiling damage from a recent water leak.

The property was not producing income during this vacancy period but my (admittedly pessimistic) budgeting plans anticipate a four-week annual vacancy period.

While home inspections were not widely attended before the last tenants vacated, interest picked up gradually from September. The property manager tells me the local rental market is oversupplied with new developments recently coming online and we eventually dropped the weekly rent from $415 initially to $410 and then to $405 as the weeks went by. Every $5 decrease translates into an additional loss for the investment of $260 per annum—less than I would have thought.

The “competition” (i.e. rentals exactly like or very similar to ours) were including a free week of rent and/or other incentives like six months of free gardening services. Our PM also suggested we could upgrade the realestate.com.au advertisement to feature/highlight our property but the rent decrease seemed the obvious way to go as it impacts the tenant’s bottom line.

We had a diverse range of applications through while the property was vacant:

• An ideal first application came from a mum and dad couple with two older, pre-teen boys and no pets. Dad was working away but mum was not employed and is, presumably, a homemaker. Unfortunately the neighbour’s aggressive dog growling through the fence scared them off (a friend initially inspected the property on their behalf as they were all living North); one of the sons was reported as having a disability and being afraid of dogs.
• We then received a second application from a mother with an older daughter, who herself has a 2yo and a newborn baby. They have a large breed dog, only 12 months old. It wasn’t clear whether mum was effectively planning to serve as guarantor for her daughter but they could service the rent payments between them. Kids and dogs don’t make for ideal tenants in my mind but that’s exactly the market we’re targeting with this style of property (4x2) in this location (outer-ring suburb). The pair were ready to go immediately on a six or twelve-month lease but, between my prompt reply to the real estate agent and their following up with the applicants, the applicants had accepted another property.
• On the back of the second application falling through, we received a third application from a very young couple (late teens/early twenties) with no rental history and very little rental affordability (<30%). Although without kids, they too have an active dog. As our only option, we discussed the risks with the property manager who thought the affordability risks were high. Meanwhile, my wife and I were both thinking back to when we were the same age, with very little income, a cat (and eventually a dog); we stayed in our first rental for four years, paid the rent on time every week, kept the property clean, and caused no damage. The PM discussed having a parent join the application as a guarantor but this couple also found an alternative rental before anything further happened.

Between applications and twice-weekly home opens, the property manager was working to see what could be done about the dog next door. The ranger was called and inspected the situation but decided the neighbour’s property is adequately fenced and the dog could not be labelled ‘menacing’. The ranger did speak with the owners and it was agreed a barrier could be placed against the fence to prevent the dog from getting as close to the boundary. Our PM also spoke to the neighbour’s PM about the situation and was told the dog would be brought inside during home opens (and is friendly once it gets to know someone).

We finally received a fourth application for a couple with two kids under five and two dogs—an older large breed dog and a younger small dog. They were requesting a 12-month lease commencing within the coming days. We approved their application and an executed lease document soon came back. At last!

The property was physically vacant for six weeks—and someone likely kicked a hole in the letterbox during that time, just for good measure—but the new tenants are hopefully in and happy as of last Friday.

Given the length of time the property was vacant, I consulted my risk matrix for some hints as to what to do next—should the vacancy period continue. My mitigation and contingency strategies were minimal (‘review property manager’ and ‘review financial controls’) but, following this experience, I added ‘review market supply’, ‘offer incentives’ and ‘promote advertisement’. I also increased the Probability rating from Remote to Occasional. Fortunately, we’re not cash flow investors and have sufficient cash buffers to weather an extended vacancy.

Although I naively expected our first tenants to stay on for another year at least, I likely need to adjust my expectations to assume a tenant will stay somewhere between 6-12 months. A 12-month lease gives us some surety but also locks us in to a rental amount and the tenant, who may or may not be problematic.

In terms of lessons learnt, I created a Landlord’s Vacating Tenants Checklist. This checklist differs from the standard checklist which might be supplied to the outgoing tenant or used by the property manager during the exit inspection in that it lists the things I need to check and do to a) ensure the tenants have done the right thing and b) ensure the property manager has done the right thing. More about the checklist and b) soon.

I suppose a disclaimer is also worth posting: I'm just a guy, I'm not an accountant, lawyer, solicitor, tax agent, mortgage broker, banker, financial adviser, insurance agent, land developer, builder, government agent, or anything else so I disclaim your application of anything I write here is to be applied at your own risk. What I write may be incorrect and you are best to seek your own professional advice (tax, legal, financial, and otherwise) before entering into contracts or spending your money. Your situation is unique to you and what I write here reflects my experience only. This content is not professional advice and is not tailored to your situation. I’m not selling anything and I do not receive any form of commission or incentive payments for any companies or individuals I endorse. I'm learning too and expect to make many, many mistakes along the way.

Enjoy,

Michael

42 - Tenant Churn

The property management firm (Century 21) managing our Brisbane property contacted us recently seeking our instructions regarding the renewal of the current 6-month lease, which runs out in the next few months.

It was noted the current rent is at the high end for the area, with a nearby estate also coming online—increasing rental supply. The agent reminded me the last (and first inspection since this lease began) was acceptable, and mentioned monies owed by the tenant are generally within tolerances.

The agent additionally mentioned a contractor reported two dogs at the property, one being a small puppy. Although I’d not formally rejected the tenant’s pet request, I hadn’t approved it either.

Despite being annoyed about the dogs—mainly the dishonesty of the matter, I proposed another six month lease at the same rate and approved the pet request as there seemed to be no option not to. I asked that our dissatisfaction about the dogs be conveyed to the tenants and requested the tenant raise any other issues now so they might be cleared up. It’s frustrating when the adults you lease a property to behave like three year-olds but if they’re paying the rent, that’s a good thing.

After all of that, the property manager came back with a response from the tenant and they won’t be renewing the lease. We haven’t been given a reason why but the agent was going to enquire.

Open Corp have noted a preference to lease to families due to the stability they offer as tenants (kids in school, general stability, other life pressures which preclude moving house, etc) but we approved the original trio of adult tenants as they had no kids, no pets, and were the first and only application we received. We also pretty much had to approve the application to secure the Open Corp 12-month rental guarantee at the original rent we desired.

Having the lease turn over means the property will need to be advertised and we’ll need to pay a new letting fee to the property manager. Of course there may also be a vacancy period. I’ve budgeted for both the costs of an annual letting fee and four week vacancy period. Although very much not preferable, I’m confident we have an adequate financial buffer to cover any gaps. Nonetheless, I also include long-term vacancy as a risk on my property investment risk register.

Admittedly, from the point we transitioned this property from acquisition and commissioning to tenancy, my expectations around the time a tenant will remain in place were likely too high. My only frame of reference for this was as tenants ourselves: we spent four years in the Adelaide house and a couple of years in a Perth rental. I hoped to get two years out of the original Brisbane lease but will adjust downwards future expectations on the back of this experience. Although I dislike the idea of churning tenants and the wear and tear a house takes in the process, as long as we have tenants in place to contribute rent towards the holding costs, I suppose I can’t care too much… everything else can be repaired! I’d be curious to know the average tenancy duration across different types of rentals in different areas…

It’s easy to trick yourself into believing being a landlord should be a set and forget exercise once the initial setup is complete. The books, magazines, and online resources (such as this blog) tend to focus on matters such as types of investment, types of property, location principles, ownership structures, financing, tax structures, and so on; the day-to-day landlording is typically glossed over by promoting the use of a property manager or improving the property to “manufacture wealth.”

The last twelve months have offered me an enormous experience as a newly-minted landlord but this role still feels very foreign to us and the mandatory, ad hoc decision making requirement when you least have the headspace to spare can honestly be a hassle. I’ll endeavour to write more about this aspect in future posts.

The property will be advertised about six weeks out from the end of the lease; it will be interesting to gauge the market and find out who we get next as tenants. I’ve intentionally remained very anonymous with these tenants but am rethinking our approach the next time around to experiment with a more personal approach (while keeping the PM in their role).

I suppose a disclaimer is also worth posting: I'm just a guy, I'm not an accountant, lawyer, solicitor, tax agent, mortgage broker, banker, financial adviser, insurance agent, land developer, builder, government agent, or anything else so I disclaim your application of anything I write here is to be applied at your own risk. What I write may be incorrect and you are best to seek your own professional advice (tax, legal, financial, and otherwise) before entering into contracts or spending your money. Your situation is unique to you and what I write here reflects my experience only. This content is not professional advice and is not tailored to your situation. I’m not selling anything and I do not receive any form of commission or incentive payments for any companies or individuals I endorse. I'm learning too and expect to make many, many mistakes along the way.

Enjoy,

Michael

38 - Surprise! Unexpected Changes

I find the vast majority of mainstream real estate reporting in the media is either all or nothing: the market is going gangbusters or it’s the next worst thing since the Great Depression and all hope is lost (I’ve given up paying any attention to the news…). There’s no middle ground. Similarly, the property spruikers only share the positives and conveniently overlook the details when they do cite a one-off example of something gone wrong.

Although many of the posts on this blog have been relatively upbeat—in line with our experience to date, I strongly believe in reality, facts, and the accurate, fair reporting of our experience. On that note, today’s post is a recounting of what is likely to be the largest single “upset” (not to dramatize) so far along our property investing journey.

Earlier this month we had three tenants in the Brisbane property and over six months remaining of a 12-month lease; then, suddenly, we had one tenant plus an “unknown” (or rather, the girlfriend of the remaining original tenant) and a pet request for a middle-aged, large-breed dog. On Friday morning last week, a water leak in the metre box was also reported.

How quickly things change from a seemingly stable position to near chaos. Fortunately, the exemplary property management team at West Property is handling all of this for us but I won’t deny I’ve found it remarkable that tenants can simply walk away from a contractual agreement they’re legally obliged to uphold. If nothing else, this doesn’t make for a good lease reference for them and they may end up have to cover re-letting fees for us.

I’m not sure why two of the three roommates have left but I believe they were together as a couple and I assume they either now aren’t or have decided they needed more privacy. I suspected there may be some instability when we took on the trio (we very much expected to end up with a family—mum, dad, two kids, and a dog) but they were the first application after a few weeks of home opens and they were happy to pay the advertised weekly rent. I thought one of them might leave eventually but wasn’t expecting any changes in the first year. In my mind, you sign a lease for twelve months, go to the hassle of moving, and then you stay put for a few years—call me simple and old fashioned.

We were notified by the property manager the pair have now moved out and requested to be removed from the lease. We had the option of saying no to this request and they would be obliged to continue paying their share of the rent—regardless of whether they’re actually living there. Practically, that option may be difficult to enforce.

In their place, the girlfriend of the remaining tenant had moved in, I’m told, but she had neither applied nor was she approved by us to live at the property. The wording in the lease document is quite specific to this point and clearly notes no one else can live in the house without prior agreement by the landlord.

If this new couple are keen to stay on, can afford the rent, and seem to be acceptable, then we’re all for that. Ideally that means no break in rental income. Plus there’s less wear and tear on the house for them to move out and be replaced with new tenants. But who is this mystery woman? Does she have an income? Does she have any prior rental referrals (or a criminal history)? Does she smoke? If she’s not paying her way, can her partner afford the full rent on his income after paying only a third of the rent to date?

Technically, there are more questions to be answered if the girlfriend checks out. Do we amend the lease to include her or have the tenants sign a new, 12-month lease? Do we increase the rent now as part of the new lease or after six months via some kind of special conditions clause (which may be tricky to do in Queensland—I’m not sure)? If the couple opt for a 50/50 split, the original tenant will need to increase his bond contribution from 1/3rd to 50%—or 100% if he’s covering the lot.

The worst-case scenarios I can imagine are having the remaining tenant vacate (for whatever reason), leaving us with an empty house to re-let and the resulting loss of income, or—if he stays—having a gap in the rent payments from the departing couple while all of this is sorted out. If all else fails, we are still covered by the Open Corp rental guarantee but that does mean having to accept any tenants they pre-screen and put forward to us (which could be good or not so good). Without checking the finer points of our insurance policy, we may also be covered for loss of rent if the rental guarantee were not in place.

Here’s another good fact sheet if you’re interested: http://tenantsqld.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/You-Want-to-Leave-Nov-09-SD_NEW.pdf

On the dog front, I simply wasn’t mentally prepared to deal with this request so early into the original lease and the property manager has recommended we say no for now (which was a relief). Before today’s revelation, we had considered allowing the pet if the (original) tenants were willing to sign a new 12-month lease effective immediately—using this request as a trigger event to keep the tenants on for a longer period. That’s less of an issue now.

We also hadn’t yet decided whether there would have been a corresponding rent increase; we can’t increase the rent mid-lease in Queensland so even a token increase would likely be the way to go to a) ensure we achieve an increase within the 12-month period, b) condition the tenant that the rent will always increase at renewal time, and c) cover any issues related to the dog (i.e. damage) as we can’t charge a pet bond in Queensland.

Meanwhile, the water leak is still being investigated by the water company. At least it’s outside and I’m told it’s likely on the water company’s side or will otherwise fall to the builder to rectify.

A few weeks on, and after consulting with Open Corp and receiving a tenancy application from the girlfriend, we offered the couple a six-month lease to see how it works out. We also increased the rent by $5/week. The lease was accepted and signed and we shouldn’t have missed any rental payments (the outgoing tenants would have been required to continue paying their share of the original lease until it was terminated). It will be interesting to see if the relationship lasts and what bearing a breakup has on the remaining tenant’s affordability; it’s easy to say a married couple with kids would have been a more stable tenant option but who knows—with the frequency of divorce I’m not convinced marriage equates to tenant longevity.

I suppose a disclaimer is also worth posting: I'm just a guy, I'm not an accountant, lawyer, solicitor, tax agent, mortgage broker, banker, financial adviser, insurance agent, land developer, builder, government agent, or anything else so I disclaim your application of anything I write here is to be applied at your own risk. What I write may be incorrect and you are best to seek your own professional advice (tax, legal, financial, and otherwise) before entering into contracts or spending your money. Your situation is unique to you and what I write here reflects my experience only. This content is not professional advice and is not tailored to your situation. I'm learning too and expect to make many, many mistakes along the way.

Enjoy,

Michael

27 - Appointing a Property Manager

The first step in transitioning our newly-built Queensland investment property to an income-generating asset—rather than a financial liability—is to find a rent-paying tenant. But let’s not jump ahead because first it’s time to find a good property manager.

As we reside in Western Australia, managing an interstate investment property ourselves would be challenging but not impossible.

Travel costs to inspect an investment property are tax deductible once the property is income generating but not before. Once a property is tenanted, the ATO allows its owners to deduct travel costs twice per year but be careful because if you and your spouse are joint owners and travel together that’s your two trips (and if you’re thinking about making the trip into a holiday opportunity, think again: you may not be able to deduct all—or any—of your costs). It’s also worthwhile attaching a dollar amount to your time and asking yourself if that time can be spent more productively.

Then there’s Queensland law, in our case, which entitles a property owner to only four inspections per year. That number includes regular, scheduled inspections by the property manager.

To my mind, hiring a licensed property manager to manage an investment property offers another layer of risk management—an insurance of sorts—and is yet another cost of “doing business” as a property investor. We could play the role ourselves but it doesn’t seem to be a good idea apart from the cost savings, which are tax deductible anyway. Speaking of insurance, some insurance companies offering landlord insurance require the insured property be managed by a professional property manager.

In theory, even an average property manager will know the area (and rent benchmarks for that area) and may have a database of possible applicants ready to go. The property manager will advertise the property, schedule and host open for inspections, screen applicants, conduct rent inspections, and manage maintenance. We also have the option of having the property manager arrange payment of some charges, such as rates, the water connection, cleaning, landlord insurance, etc from rents collected. Of course a property manager also deals with rent collection and bond monies and can represent you at tribunal (for an additional fee) if necessary.

Importantly, a property manager offers a layer of separation between you and your tenants to avoid getting too personal and keep things business-like.

Expect to pay between 7 and 10 percent for a property manager. In our case that breaks down as commission of 5.5% of one week’s rent (including GST) plus a 2.2% management fee.

I’ve heard it suggested finding a good property manager is imperative but perhaps not the easiest thing to do. There are countless property managers for hire out there and a much smaller selection of really good ones.

Open Wealth recommended us to West Property Group (Century 21) and I spoke with Kerry West, the proprietor, who was extremely helpful and patient as we talked about everything from insurance to rent expectations to annual rent increases to pet bonds and so on. Kerry is a property investor herself and having someone representing you who understands what you’re trying to achieve is a big plus in my view.

Notably, Open Wealth include a rental guarantee with their properties, the terms of which mandate the property is to be managed through the agent they nominate.

Our success is linked with that of Open Wealth, in a way, so it’s obviously good for Open Wealth to have their client’s properties managed by good managers, with the added bonus that we receive a slightly discounted management rate. At the end of the day, this property is a turn-key investment and I’m happy to accept Open Wealth’s advice as we move from acquisition and construction to “commissioning”.

There were a few minor differences between property management norms in WA and Queensland that surprised us.

We’ve previously rented in Perth and, as tenants, had to pay the letting fee ourselves; in Queensland, the landlord pays the letting fee (of 110% of one week’s rent—inc GST). 

Apparently the area attracts many families with pets. In WA, as pet owning tenants, we paid a pet bond. In Queensland it’s not legal to charge a pet bond. I’ll be writing more about pets in an upcoming post.

Given the rental guarantee, the geographic distance between Perth and Brisbane, and our lack of experience as landlords, appointing a professional property manager is the right thing do in our case, at least for now. Hopefully they earn their keep and attract a quality tenant at a good weekly rent!

I suppose a disclaimer is also worth posting: I'm just a guy, I'm not an accountant, lawyer, solicitor, tax agent, mortgage broker, banker, financial adviser, insurance agent, land developer, builder, government agent, or anything else so I disclaim your application of anything I write here is to be applied at your own risk. What I write may be incorrect and you are best to seek your own professional advice (tax, legal, financial, and otherwise) before entering into contracts or spending your money. Your situation is unique to you and what I write here reflects my experience only. This content is not professional advice and is not tailored to your situation. I'm learning too and expect to make many, many mistakes along the way.

Enjoy,

Michael

23 – Progress Update: Fixing Stage Complete

On Monday came the “enclosed” invoice for a not-insignificant chunk of cash; today the “fixing” stage invoice arrived for about half that amount again. Apparently the builder was hanging on to invoices around the end of financial year period.

If nothing else, it seems like progress is moving quickly now (quicker than it really is!). In either case, we’re now nearing the end of the construction phase with “practical completion” the last outstanding invoice.

Stacey, our Client Liason Manager at Open Wealth, called this morning to let me know the fixing stage invoice would be sent through and we also spoke briefly about inspections, insurance, and property management. Notably, the real estate agency recommended by Open Wealth will send us an updated rental appraisal. The initial appraisal we received late last year was (a conservative) $380/week and I’m curious to see whether this has moved up or down (Open Wealth suggested the actual rental income on many of their builds in this estate is closer to the $410/week mark—I based my forecasts on the $380 figure). As more new product becomes available in this estate, and on the back the health of the national economy, I’ll be interested to see where we land—hopefully above the $380 benchmark and also in relation to the higher $410 figure.

It’s hard to believe we’re already nearing the point when a tenant will move in and the property will become income generating. Although I’d obviously prefer to be on the ground supervising the details of the build and feeling in-tune with this aspect of the process, I’m also comfortable knowing we don’t need to be there—that we’ve put our trust in Open Wealth and paid them to stand in our place while we undertake more productive activities.

With this stage complete, items like the plastering, tiling, kitchen, and laundry have been ticked off. With the next milestone, tap ware, sinks, shower screen, light fittings, air conditioners, blinds, and kitchen appliances go in, the carpet will be laid and the house painted, feature walls will be rendered and the driveway poured, the letterbox will be built, and the house will be cleaned.

Meanwhile, the property manager will be rounding up potential tenants for short-listing by Open Wealth and, ultimately, selection by us. The builder will have two weeks to address any issues found during inspection (following the practical completion milestone) and it may be possible (I’d guess likely—given the rental guarantee) there will be a few pre-handover inspections before any formal open for inspections take place after handover.

I suppose a disclaimer is also worth posting: I'm just a guy, I'm not an accountant, lawyer, solicitor, tax agent, mortgage broker, banker, financial adviser, insurance agent, land developer, builder, government agent, or anything else so I disclaim your application of anything I write here is to be applied at your own risk. What I write may be incorrect and you are best to seek your own professional advice (tax, legal, financial, and otherwise) before entering into contracts or spending your money. Your situation is unique to you and what I write here reflects my experience only. This content is not professional advice and is not tailored to your situation. I'm learning too and expect to make many, many mistakes along the way.

Enjoy,

Michael