46 – Holiday Homes Make Poor Investments

We spent last weekend five hours South of Perth in Albany, WA. With the kids in tow, we rented a cutesy old cottage for they duration so they’d have their own rooms and space to run around.

Being away in this context soon got me thinking about the many reasons why we veered away from holiday homes/apartments as an investment. With family frequently visiting from intrastate and overseas, a property that could be rented out is when not in use was hugely appealing to us at first glance but many reasons led us to reconsider.

When we first started looking seriously at property investment, one of my first thoughts was to purchase a holiday apartment. I figured something with a few bedrooms in nearby Scarborough might not cost too much and “Scarbs” is an increasingly vibrant area in Perth. It’s also a good spot for visiting tourists with its expansive beaches and nearby amenities. I’ll note this was before I came to prefer land (i.e. a house on a block of land) over apartments and decided to invest for long-term growth rather than cash flow—in short, don’t buy an apartment because the land content ratio is too low…). In general, you’ll likely pay a premium to buy in a holiday location—which may not relate to long-term capital growth. In other words, are you better off buying into a highly-priced holiday location or doing your research to buy into a cheaper suburb that’s likely to grow faster and produce a better return on investment in the long run?

We also had to ask ourselves whether we buy something local for the sake of the visiting relies or choose something further afield in a more interesting (to us) location—either out of town or in another state. If we wanted to make use of the property ourselves, would a “holiday at home” (er, a property in Perth, where we live) be all that desirable?

Regardless of location, the ability to produce an income will always be at the mercy of the local short-term rental market and tourism conditions. Although I’m no expert in this area, I’ll hazard a guess that sites like Air BnB are eating into the traditional short stay markets.

With a normal rental, you have the surety (in a way) of a guaranteed weekly rent for the term of the lease. With a holiday home, you might have a higher nightly rate but the uncertainty of whether the property will be full one night and vacant the next—which, on average, may or may not equate to the same income as a regular rental. Averages are useful but may hide seasonal ups and downs and corresponding cash flow troughs throughout the financial year.

Unlike a typical suburban house rental where we’re renting a property to a tenant as a place to live, as their home, with a holiday home we’re dealing with a different set of variables. How closely are holiday makers vetted? How do we insure the property? Will neighbours object to the comings and goings of visitors at unusual hours? What happens if China crashes and the Chinese tourists suddenly dry up? We had a global recession not all that long ago; are the Yanks still flying in to little old Perth at the same rate they were before the dot com and housing market crashes?

At the very least, you’ll need to estimate vacancy, affix a nightly rental price tag that fits the market and attracts the right kind of holiday makers or travellers, and then consider marketing costs (for your online listing, membership with the local tourism body or visitor centre, etc) and cleaning costs. Of course the property will also need to be furnished with not only furniture and appliances but linens, cookware, books/DVDs, artwork, etc. Other running costs will include electricity, water, gardening, and possibly cable and internet, as well as the usual rates and insurances.

Don’t forget, if you want to use the property yourself, the ATO will require you to exclude the period when the property was not available for rent as a percentage of any deductions you might want to claim (i.e. negative gearing). On the upside, you may be able to claim a higher rate of depreciation (4% p.a. over 25 years instead of 2.5% p.a. over 40 years).

If you want to use the property yourself during peak periods, then you’ll likely have to forego any income the property would otherwise generate during that time.

The property we rented in Albany, although lovely in an historic kind of way and very practical for our young family, has zero appeal to me from a practical and maintenance standpoint. Although the main house felt sturdy and sound, the back extension (these places always have a back extension, right?!?) had a definite lilt to it despite being the newer construction.

Then my wife plugged in the kettle for her morning tea but it wouldn’t switch on because she’d unwittingly tripped the circuit. Of course we just thought the kettle was a dud—until it came time for a shower and we had no hot water from the instant gas system with its electric ignition. It took a very upset wife and a call to the neighbouring manager, at 8:30am on a Sunday morning, to sort that one out.

We’ve been living in a relatively new house in Perth for going on a decade now and although it’s been a pretty easy run there are always things to deal with—we’ve already had to replace the hot water tank, for example. I cannot begin to imagine the countless number of ongoing issues to be found with an older house. On the one hand, it’s established and “bedded in” but how soon until the roof needs replacing or the foundation restumping? Insects and damp or mould may be problematic in older houses and the electrics may be shady.

Although I’d love to have a nearby holiday home for the relatives or a beach shack down south that we can use periodically, as an investment we’ll be sticking with suburban houses for now and fork out for a week or two in that holiday rental when we want to get away.

I suppose a disclaimer is also worth posting: I'm just a guy, I'm not an accountant, lawyer, solicitor, tax agent, mortgage broker, banker, financial adviser, insurance agent, land developer, builder, government agent, or anything else so I disclaim your application of anything I write here is to be applied at your own risk. What I write may be incorrect and you are best to seek your own professional advice (tax, legal, financial, and otherwise) before entering into contracts or spending your money. Your situation is unique to you and what I write here reflects my experience only. This content is not professional advice and is not tailored to your situation. I’m not selling anything and I do not receive any form of commission or incentive payments for any companies or individuals I endorse. I'm learning too and expect to make many, many mistakes along the way.

Enjoy,

Michael

43 - Recapping the IP#2 land purchase

What a roller coaster ride we’ve had “just” to buy a plot of land over the last six months! We’re nearly there now and I wanted to briefly highlight some of the issues we encountered in securing the block of land and finance. In summary, the land titles have registered and we’re finally approaching settlement.

If you’re interested in the details, I’ve linked to earlier posts below.

Step 1: Difficult finance pre-approval

We kicked off towards the end of 2015 when I asked our mortgage broker to look into finance pre-approval following my return to work several months prior. Although the wife was on maternity leave, I’d nonetheless been tinkering with the idea of a second investment build. The broker deemed our bank-appointed credit assessor to be unreasonably pernickety but finance was provisionally approved on the basis of servicing via my income alone.

I then needed to convince dear wife a second investment build is a good idea and gave Open Corp the okay to proceed once we reached agreement.

Step 2: Property selection do-over

All was looking rosy with the first property selected for us by Open Corp until the vendor mysteriously sat on the signed land contract for some weeks. It turned out we’d been gazumped by a large buyer who apparently bought out all remaining blocks in the release—including those blocks with unexecuted contracts.

By this point, our bank pre-approval was due to expire but Open Corp quickly found us a similar, alternate property in a neighbouring estate. It was slightly larger, with a correspondingly larger price tag. In the interest of time, we nominated Open Corp to purchase the property on our behalf.

Step 3: Short valuation

The Valex-appointed valuation company contracted by the bank to value this second block came back with an ill-considered short valuation. We were told by Open Corp and otherwise of the view the property value was in line with the contract price. Appeals to the valuer (Peter Jones from Lee Property) and the bank to review or reconsider a similar valuation that came in at cost for a similar property in the same estate fell on deaf ears. In brief, the valuer considered an inappropriate set of comparable properties and didn’t do his job. Unfortunately, there would be no getting around this and we’ll need to contribute the shortfall from our equity loan.

Step 4: Finance do-over

Throughout the valuation shenanigans, the contract I was on at work came to an abrupt end and left us as a no income, two kids (NITK—my acronym?) household—not all that appealing to a lender when it comes to their evaluation of a client’s ability to make loan repayments. The wife was still on maternity leave and, although she had a contract to resume work (and was actually on leave—maternity leave), the initial finance application was based on my income alone because our mortgage broker didn’t think her potential income would be considered. With my last pay stub showing the drop off in hours, it was difficult to prove to the bank we could afford this loan. For good measure, my overarching head contract also ran out!

Meanwhile, our deadline for finance approval with the land vendor was due to expire. A one-week extension was approved, provided the deposit was paid in full by the original due date. I wasn’t terribly comfortable paying the deposit until finance was unconditional but both Open Corp and our (independent) mortgage broker confirmed it was fully refundable.

Through a tip from another mortgage broker, I persuaded our broker to approach the bank about taking into account the wife’s signed work contract, commencing on her return to work from maternity leave and well before settlement. I’d been told the bank we were working with had recently softened their stance on maternity leave. Of course we first had to find the wife’s contract, which was buried in her work emails as an attachment she couldn’t access remotely. Her maternity leave had also been paid upfront so she had no recent pay slips.

The final hurdle was the build contract, signed by nomination, which the bank wouldn’t accept. A new contract was couriered out to us and signed in a hurry before being couriered back to be executed anew by the builder.

With the build contract sorted, the maternity leave strategy delivered and finance was finally approved.

Step 5: Deposits

Although the Open Corp land deposit is normally $2,000, our land contract stipulated the typical 5% deposit. As mentioned above, the extension required us to pay the balance before finance was unconditionally approved.

The builder’s deposit (5% of the build price) also came due just after finance approval and the balance of Open Corp’s fee was also payable.

It’s at this point—when significant amounts of money are moving out of the account—that it all starts to get real. Of course land titles haven’t yet registered and settlement hasn’t yet come about. Perhaps more importantly, in terms of getting a paying tenant through the doors, construction hasn’t yet started.

Step 6: Finance re-do over

A final twist to the finance saw our request for an LMI waiver come through shortly after signing the first loan documents, which necessitated the inconvenience having the loan documents signed again. We weren’t sure how this was going to play out before this point so it was a happy surprise, at least.

Step 7: Certified ID

As a final poke in the eye, I heard from Open Corp—two days before our anticipated settlement date—to say the solicitor needed a certified copy of our ID. On very short notice, the wife was fortunately able to find a Justice of the Peace at the hospital who could certify her ID… the head pharmacist, he was paged and materialised from a sterile room in a full biohazard suit to help her out!

Subject to the bank, settlement is scheduled this week.

Update (bonus Step 8!)

Wow, we’ll never cut a break with this one!

We settled on Thursday morning at midday but first had a call from our Eastern states solicitor at 7am to say the bank wanted a $25,000 owner contribution (the day before it was $0). That amount was not only more than I could transfer online given our daily transfer limit but it was also more than the bank’s first-line call centre rep could manage for us.

I asked to speak with the rep’s supervisor and, after going through some additional identification questions and a nuclear launch sequence involving call backs and temporary passcodes, I was able to make the transfer.

I suppose a disclaimer is also worth posting: I'm just a guy, I'm not an accountant, lawyer, solicitor, tax agent, mortgage broker, banker, financial adviser, insurance agent, land developer, builder, government agent, or anything else so I disclaim your application of anything I write here is to be applied at your own risk. What I write may be incorrect and you are best to seek your own professional advice (tax, legal, financial, and otherwise) before entering into contracts or spending your money. Your situation is unique to you and what I write here reflects my experience only. This content is not professional advice and is not tailored to your situation. I’m not selling anything and I do not receive any form of commission or incentive payments for any companies or individuals I endorse. I'm learning too and expect to make many, many mistakes along the way.

Enjoy,

Michael

39 – Gazumped

I’ve mentioned a few times on this blog how smoothly everything went with the first investment property. From land and build contracts, to finance, to construction, and tenanting it was one tick in the box after another. When we set about repeating the process with Open Corp, I expected an identical outcome, this time with the benefit of personal experience.

Through no fault of Open Corp’s, we’ve had a rocky start this time. Our finance pre-approval, with me only recently back to work and the wife on maternity leave, was heavily scrutinised by the bank and was finally approved in mid-December—valid for three months, including the Christmas holidays. Dear wife then took her time finally agreeing to the commitment before we gave Open Corp the green light.

More recently, with our pre-approval due to expire within a week, I received a call from Open Corp telling us a larger buyer had come in and offered to purchase all remaining blocks in the development we were to buy in to—including all blocks with non-executed contracts. We’d signed the contract but it hadn’t yet been fully executed (signed) by the vendor. I’m not sure if it applies in the fullest sense to this specific situation, but I think we were gazumped.

Open Corp were helpfully able to secure another, larger block for us in a neighbouring estate (at a higher cost due to the increased land size—with the difference to be rebated back to us). They also had our initial deposit refunded from the original land developer and applied to this new property. The stamp duty will be about a thousand dollars more because of the increased sale price but I’m comfortable with that seeing as how we’ll be getting an extra 48sqm at minimal cost.

Given the timelines for the finance pre-approval, we were able to nominate Open Corp to sign the land and build contracts on our behalf (the property is in Victoria) and the mortgage broker was able to submit our finance application on the last day of our pre-approval… still without an executed land contract.

Land contracts just aren’t working out for us this time around. It’s now been two weeks since the final finance application was submitted and we’re still waiting on the executed land contract. I have no idea what the hold up is this time and apparently neither do Open Corp but it’s all slightly concerning—especially coming from where we’ve been with the first block. Will the same thing happen with the unexecuted contract being sold to a bulk purchaser? Is whoever does the signing at the vendor’s end out of town? In other words, what’s going on?!?

[Update (6 April): the signed land contracts finally came back late last week, which of course starts the clock ticking for the finance approval…]

Meanwhile, the bank seems to be moving the application forward without this seemingly important document and have ordered a valuation on the property and requested a few extra pieces of documentation from us. I have no experience how flexible the major banks are with the deadlines for their pre-approvals and I’d be very curious to know what happens next if this purchase falls over on the land contract.

All of this is unnerving and frustrating but we’ve never had any major issues buying or securing finance for our PPOR or the first IP and I’m hoping this will come good. I know finance is often the biggest hurdle for many buyers and it was certainly a relief to move forward from the point of unconditional finance approval with the first IP.

Compounding matters, the bank (a different lender to the one we used for the first IP—to avoid cross-collateralising) has flagged a possible issue approving a 10% LMI discount for us. Certain professionals are eligible to pay a 10% deposit instead on the typical 20% deposit before LMI kicks in and the wife, being a doctor, falls into that category of professional. The only problem from the bank’s perspective is the fact she’s not working… or more precisely, as I’d describe it: she’s on leave (maternity leave)—and she is therefore still employed. Unfortunately she has no current pay stubs to prove that to the bank and we’re waiting on a letter from her employer in the hope the bank will accept that.

I hope we’ll have a better view of both the land contract and the finance situation this next (short) week but I won’t bet on it.

I suppose a disclaimer is also worth posting: I'm just a guy, I'm not an accountant, lawyer, solicitor, tax agent, mortgage broker, banker, financial adviser, insurance agent, land developer, builder, government agent, or anything else so I disclaim your application of anything I write here is to be applied at your own risk. What I write may be incorrect and you are best to seek your own professional advice (tax, legal, financial, and otherwise) before entering into contracts or spending your money. Your situation is unique to you and what I write here reflects my experience only. This content is not professional advice and is not tailored to your situation. I'm learning too and expect to make many, many mistakes along the way.

Enjoy,

Michael

28 - To Inspect or Not to Inspect?

One of the inclusions of building an investment property with Open Wealth Corporation is a travel “allowance”, of sorts, funded from the development management fee paid at the beginning of the process. The question facing us now is whether we take advantage of those funds and see the property and the house for the first time with our own eyes.

Open Wealth offered us the opportunity to fly to Queensland from WA to inspect the area when we were considering a purchase and again at land settlement. With construction now complete, and no tenant in the house as yet, we recently received a final offer to have a look. In our case, we’ll be reimbursed $400 for costs to get to Brisbane and back, which is money that will otherwise go back to Open Wealth. As a return flight to Brisbane from Perth costs $538 at a minimum, we’ve been asking ourselves whether we spend the extra money and inspect the build or not.

Were it not for the money (and possibly the time), the question would be a silly one and the answer would be “of course! We’ve just built a new house so why wouldn’t we want to see it?!?”

The obvious response is to remain emotionally detached from what is a purely financial investment. We have no plans of ever living in Queensland or in this property and as long as it can be successfully rented to fund the cost of holding the true asset—the land—we shouldn’t care if the front door is pink or what the view out the front window looks like. We don’t actually need to see it in person.

The practical man inside of me, however, has a slightly different opinion on such things. Including our family home, this is the second house we’ve now had constructed by a project builder. From experience with our first build, we know some things will have been overlooked and some things will have been delivered to an unacceptably low standard. These defects, if not addressed during the builder’s warranty period, have the potential to translate into a significant cost to us in the future.

I’ve previously noted Open Wealth conduct a number of inspections throughout the build and the first and second practical completion inspections have already occurred. A small number of defects were logged and the builder addressed those defects promptly. The defect list seemed well-considered and detailed. To that end, my visit is likely redundant but for the $200 and a day out I’d rather be certain—I don’t have laser vision but it’s pretty close and I’m a stickler for details.

I’d also like to photograph the house inside out before tenants move in. Open Wealth will again be providing us with professional photographs of the completed house and the property manager will take dozens of photographs for the baseline property inspection report before the first tenant moves in. Like I said, stickler for details.

Beyond the basic house inspection, Open Wealth will supply me with a driver for the day and suggested I have a look around the local area. I’ve never been to Brisbane before and, if we opt to build again, having a better (albeit very quick) feel for the city and state will be helpful. I’ll also be meeting the builder’s site manager and one of the property managers from Century 21 and it will be great to have that personal contact.

As we’ve got two young kids at home it’s going to be a quick one: fly over in the morning and fly home that night. I’m hopeful it will be worthwhile.

I suppose a disclaimer is also worth posting: I'm just a guy, I'm not an accountant, lawyer, solicitor, tax agent, mortgage broker, banker, financial adviser, insurance agent, land developer, builder, government agent, or anything else so I disclaim your application of anything I write here is to be applied at your own risk. What I write may be incorrect and you are best to seek your own professional advice (tax, legal, financial, and otherwise) before entering into contracts or spending your money. Your situation is unique to you and what I write here reflects my experience only. This content is not professional advice and is not tailored to your situation. I'm learning too and expect to make many, many mistakes along the way.

Enjoy,

Michael

25 – Insurance for Landlords

As we move progressively closer to the “launch” of our first investment property, our handler at Open Wealth noted we should start looking at insurance options. I seem to write a lot about insurance!

For our family home, we have building insurance because the bank requires it and this is the same for an investment property, of course. Although the building itself is a depreciating asset, it’s what allows us to generate revenue on the land (an appreciating asset) and would be expensive to repair or rebuild in the event of fire, flood, impact from space debris (!), etc, etc.

We also have contents insurance to cover the things inside the house like the furniture, clothing, pots and pans, and the TV. Notably, our insurance company classifies window and floor coverings under the banner of contents insurance.

As landlords we have a few more things to consider, such as malicious damage by a tenant and lost rental income for reasons like the tenant not paying rent. We also need public liability insurance to cover things like a tenant injuring himself because he tripped over a crack in our driveway, for example. In general, these things come under the heading of “landlord insurance”.

When I initially started comparing insurance products, I assumed we’d need standard building (and possibly contents) cover and then bolt on a landlord insurance product through the same insurer or another insurer. I was surprised to find that many insurers selling landlord insurance already bundle building and landlord under the heading of Landlord Insurance, and typically include public liability insurance as part of that offering. These products also tend to cover window and floor coverings too—either through the building component of the policy or through a modest contents component.

As usual, the pricing and inclusions for insurance from the various providers varies widely. I’ve received quotes ranging in cost from $600 to nearly $2000 for our 4x2 single storey IP. Some insurers will include removal of rubbish and motor burnout while others do not. Some insurers include theft by a tenant while others list it as optional. Most insurers will deduct the bond from any claim payment for themselves—but not all. Some insurers will insure you only if the property is managed by a licensed property manager and has a fixed term lease in place—i.e. not a periodic lease; others offer flexibility on these points. The only way to get to the point of a like for like comparison is to read the (lengthy—and boring) product disclosure statements for each product you may be considering. Needless to say, the last few evenings at our house have been painfully dry!

I’ve also investigated having a broker recommend a suitable insurance product and thus far Queensland Insurance Services has supplied me with a few quotes after I submitted a fact finder document to them.

One nice feature offered by some insurers like Allianz and CGU is the option to pay monthly, instead of annually, at no extra cost. Normally I’d prefer the convenience (and cost savings) of paying annually for personal bills but when it comes to an investment property I’m thinking more about cashflow—especially in these early days when the property will be negatively geared.

In terms of paying for running costs like these, we’ve got a few options. The easiest would be to have the property manager deduct the payment amount from rents collected and then make the payment on our behalf. I haven’t set this up yet but likely will once I’ve got a grip on it all. An alternative would be to pay costs from the line of credit account we have associated with this property—and into which rental income and tax variations are paid.

I’m still in the process of exploring insurance companies in Queensland. As we’re insured through GIO in Western Australia, I’d hoped to insure this property in Queensland with them as well to obtain a multi-policy discount. Unfortunately GIO don’t offer insurance in Queensland—despite the fact their parent company, Suncorp—does. Which is frustrating.

Mortgage Choice referred me to Allianz and they’ve come back with a strong quote; I’d initially written them off because their online quote system told me they don’t insure for flood but the rep I spoke to following the Mortgage Choice referral was able to add flood cover. I’ve also had a look at RACQ but they don’t offer landlord insurance.

Suncorp seems to be very similar to GIO here but they are a little pricey. I’ve also looked at Commbank, Terri Sheer (owned by Suncorp—also a little expensive but recommended to me by our newly-appointed property manager, who gets a $22 kickback if we sign up), CGU (very cheap but offering a strong insurance product as far as I can tell), and QBE.

As I do with all of my insurance purchases, I’ll increase the basic excess to at least $1000. I’m not sure if this is a wise move or not for the small cost savings. That’s the unfortunate thing about tenants: they’re largely outside of your control in your house (er, investment property)!

One final aspect to consider when selecting an insurer is how likely they’ll be to pay a claim. This will likely come down to experience and anecdotal evidence from jaded (or maybe the odd happy) customers who post about their experience online.

Insurance, despite being awkward and boring, is one of those things required to manage risk. You pay the premium in the hope you’ll never need to make a claim.

I suppose a disclaimer is also worth posting: I'm just a guy, I'm not an accountant, lawyer, solicitor, tax agent, mortgage broker, banker, financial adviser, insurance agent, land developer, builder, government agent, or anything else so I disclaim your application of anything I write here is to be applied at your own risk. What I write may be incorrect and you are best to seek your own professional advice (tax, legal, financial, and otherwise) before entering into contracts or spending your money. Your situation is unique to you and what I write here reflects my experience only. This content is not professional advice and is not tailored to your situation. I'm learning too and expect to make many, many mistakes along the way.

Enjoy,

Michael

12 – Progress Update: Settlement

Settlement day today and everything went smoothly, as far as I know. I received an SMS from the bank to notify us settlement is complete, an email from our solicitor, and an email and phone call from our Client Liaison Manager at Open Wealth to say congratulations. So I’ll call that done.

I’d suggest this would be a good occasion to pop a bottle of bubbly but the wife is pregnant and heading out for dinner with the girls tonight, no less. So, in our usual way, we’ll let the occasion pass without much excitement. What investment property?!

Here’s a picture of a pile of dirt—but it’s our pile dirt (er, the bank’s pile of dirt rather)! Good to see the skies are blue in Queensland so hopefully progress can be made without too many disruptions from the weather.

I’m told by Open Wealth “the builder has arranged the soil test, engineering plans and working drawings and the plans have been submitted into council for approval”. “While the plans are being approved the builder will be organising the site works, retaining walls, sediment barriers, driveway shake-down and signage.”

Open Wealth expect 6-8 weeks for permits (ideally six since we paid the 5% builder’s deposit up front and should have jump-started the process) and then things start to really get underway.

I would have preferred to be further along by now, with the original aim of having tenants in place by the end of the 2014/15 financial year but settlement has pushed us out to October (worst case, on the basis of the 30-week construction guarantee Open Wealth includes). Naturally, this will be particularly awesome timing—he said sarcastically—as I’ll likely be overseas as we transition from construction to rental.

The base stage complete milestone is next, which is everything before framing starts.

All said, I’m impressed with myself for a) doing this and b) doing this as well as I possibly could using my newfound knowledge. When we built our PPOR in 2006, we were clueless and did as we were told. Rather than try and understand the process, we followed the bouncing ball. We lucked out in general, but for an investment property I felt complete engagement was necessary. This will be one of several (future) income generating assets which I intend to run as a business and I believe it would have been amiss of me not to dive deep into the semantics. Yes, we’ve still followed the bouncing ball in general because the process outlined by Open Wealth is aligned to my knowledge and strategy but I now understand why the ball bounces and I’ve not hesitated to correct its trajectory when I felt it was heading in the wrong direction.

Time will tell whether we’re doing the right thing but right now I’m comfortable knowing I’ve taken the first steps to secure my financial future and done it in a way that I understand and believe to be correct.

I suppose a disclaimer is also worth posting: I'm just a guy, I'm not an accountant, lawyer, solicitor, tax agent, mortgage broker, banker, financial adviser, insurance agent, land developer, builder, government agent, or anything else so I disclaim your application of anything I write here is to be applied at your own risk. What I write may be incorrect and you are best to seek your own professional advice (tax, legal, financial, and otherwise) before entering into contracts or spending your money. Your situation is unique to you and what I write here reflects my experience only. This content is not professional advice and is not tailored to your situation. I'm learning too and expect to make many, many mistakes along the way.

Enjoy,

Michael

10 – Progress Update: Survey Plan Registration

In all honesty I’m not 100% certain what this means but we received a letter from our solicitor on Friday noting “the Survey Plan relating to our purchase has registered in the Titles Office” (which seems to be the Department of Natural Resource and Mines, Queensland). We now have a settlement date of 20 March—finally!

Like I said, I don’t fully understand what this means, but I think the land developer has now completed the necessary developments for the land we’re purchasing and the rest of the development (sewerage, street lighting, paving, etc). We’ll still need building plans to go through council, which can likely start only now (or post-settlement).

The solicitor also sent a draft settlement statement, part of which caught my eye.

Specifically, the bank (that is, the bank covering the main loan for this investment property) will be advancing around $185,000 at settlement and we are required to make up the balance.

Now we’re fine to do this through the line of credit we established to cover the 10% of the purchase price and costs but my naive assumption was that our main loan would be drawn down in full for the land purchase and part of the construction costs, before we’d start drawing down the LOC.

But of course that would be too simplistic. More importantly, to the banks thinking anyway, we could theoretically run out of money to pay for the build. No build means no income, which to the bank means greater risk that we’ll default on the mortgage. The bank which holds our main loan has no idea about our LOC.

No matter, we’ll do things this way and everything will balance out in the end. It does mean we’ll have to pay a tiny bit of extra interest because the interest rate on our LOC is slightly higher than that of our main loan. At least it’s all deductible interest.

I suppose a disclaimer is also worth posting: I'm just a guy, I'm not an accountant, lawyer, solicitor, tax agent, mortgage broker, banker, financial adviser, insurance agent, land developer, builder, government agent, or anything else so I disclaim your application of anything I write here is to be applied at your own risk. What I write may be incorrect and you are best to seek your own professional advice (tax, legal, financial, and otherwise) before entering into contracts or spending your money. Your situation is unique to you and what I write here reflects my experience only. This content is not professional advice and is not tailored to your situation. I'm learning too and expect to make many, many mistakes along the way.

Enjoy,

Michael